Helm vs Kustomize vs Jsonnet: Which Config Tool Should You Use in 2026?
Helm, Kustomize, and Jsonnet all solve Kubernetes config management differently. Here's an honest comparison to help you pick the right one for your team.
Every DevOps team eventually faces this: you need to manage Kubernetes configs across dev, staging, and prod environments ā and plain YAML doesn't scale. The three main tools are Helm, Kustomize, and Jsonnet (via Tanka or raw).
Quick Summary
| Helm | Kustomize | Jsonnet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Template style | Go templates | Patch overlays | Functional programming |
| Learning curve | Medium | Low | High |
| Package management | Yes (charts) | No | No |
| ArgoCD support | Native | Native | Via plugin |
| Best for | Distributing reusable packages | Environment overlays | Complex, programmatic configs |
Helm
Helm uses Go templates to generate Kubernetes manifests. You define a values.yaml and templates reference the values.
# templates/deployment.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: {{ .Values.name }}
spec:
replicas: {{ .Values.replicas }}
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: {{ .Values.name }}
image: "{{ .Values.image.repository }}:{{ .Values.image.tag }}"
resources:
limits:
cpu: {{ .Values.resources.limits.cpu }}
memory: {{ .Values.resources.limits.memory }}Override values per environment:
helm install myapp ./mychart -f values-prod.yamlBest for:
- Distributing software to others (Prometheus, ArgoCD, Cert-Manager all ship as Helm charts)
- When you want package versioning and rollbacks
- Teams that need a catalog of pre-built charts
Downsides:
- Go templates get unreadable fast
- Debugging template errors is painful
- Not great for managing your OWN application across environments (use Kustomize for that)
Kustomize
Kustomize works with plain YAML and applies patches on top of a base. No templates, no new language.
my-app/
āāā base/
ā āāā deployment.yaml
ā āāā service.yaml
ā āāā kustomization.yaml
āāā overlays/
āāā dev/
ā āāā kustomization.yaml
āāā prod/
āāā kustomization.yaml
āāā replicas-patch.yaml
Base kustomization:
# base/kustomization.yaml
resources:
- deployment.yaml
- service.yamlProd overlay:
# overlays/prod/kustomization.yaml
bases:
- ../../base
patches:
- path: replicas-patch.yaml
namePrefix: prod-
commonLabels:
env: productionReplicas patch:
# overlays/prod/replicas-patch.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app
spec:
replicas: 5Build and apply:
kubectl apply -k overlays/prod/
# or
kustomize build overlays/prod/ | kubectl apply -f -Best for:
- Managing your own application across multiple environments
- Teams that want to stay in plain YAML
- GitOps workflows with ArgoCD or FluxCD
- Simple to moderate complexity configs
Downsides:
- No loops or conditionals ā if you need to create 10 similar resources, you're copy-pasting
- Patches can get confusing with strategic merge vs JSON6902 patch types
- No built-in package management
Jsonnet (via Grafana Tanka)
Jsonnet is a data templating language ā think JSON + functions + variables. Tanka wraps it for Kubernetes.
// environments/prod/main.jsonnet
local k = import "k.libsonnet";
local app = import "../../lib/app.libsonnet";
{
deployment: app.new(
name="my-app",
image="myrepo/myapp:v2.1.0",
replicas=5,
env="production",
),
}// lib/app.libsonnet
local k = import "k.libsonnet";
{
new(name, image, replicas=1, env="dev"):: {
apiVersion: "apps/v1",
kind: "Deployment",
metadata: { name: name, labels: { env: env } },
spec: {
replicas: replicas,
selector: { matchLabels: { app: name } },
template: {
metadata: { labels: { app: name } },
spec: {
containers: [{
name: name,
image: image,
}],
},
},
},
},
}Best for:
- Teams managing hundreds of microservices with complex shared logic
- Grafana's ecosystem (Tanka is used internally at Grafana Labs)
- When you need real programming constructs: loops, conditionals, functions, imports
Downsides:
- Steep learning curve ā new language to learn
- Smaller community than Helm/Kustomize
- ArgoCD requires a plugin (not native)
- Debugging requires tooling
When to Use Each
Use Helm when:
- You're consuming third-party charts (always use Helm for this)
- You're distributing your app as a package for others to install
- You want chart versioning and
helm rollback
Use Kustomize when:
- You're managing your own application across 2-5 environments
- You want to stay in plain YAML with minimal overhead
- You're already using ArgoCD or FluxCD (both have native Kustomize support)
Use Jsonnet/Tanka when:
- You have 50+ microservices with shared config patterns
- Your team is comfortable with a new language
- You need real programming logic in your configs
The Most Common Pattern in 2026
Most mature teams use Helm + Kustomize together:
- Use Helm charts for third-party software (Prometheus, cert-manager, ingress-nginx)
- Use Kustomize for your own application across environments
- Store everything in Git and deploy with ArgoCD
āāā infrastructure/
ā āāā helm/ # third-party charts as HelmRelease objects
ā āāā prometheus/
ā āāā cert-manager/
āāā applications/
āāā my-app/ # your app with Kustomize
āāā base/
āāā overlays/
This gives you the best of both: Helm's package ecosystem for external tools, and Kustomize's simplicity for your own code.
Resources:
Today I Fixed
Short real fixes from production ā posted daily
Stay ahead of the curve
Get the latest DevOps, Kubernetes, AWS, and AI/ML guides delivered straight to your inbox. No spam ā just practical engineering content.
Related Articles
Build a GitOps Pipeline with ArgoCD and Helm (2026 Project Walkthrough)
A complete GitOps setup with ArgoCD and Helm ā from installing ArgoCD to auto-deploying your app when you push to Git.
Helmfile vs Kustomize for Multi-Environment Kubernetes Deployments
Both Helmfile and Kustomize manage environment-specific Kubernetes configurations, but they take completely different approaches. Here's the practical comparison with real config examples.
How to Set Up FluxCD for GitOps on Kubernetes from Scratch (2026)
Step-by-step guide to installing FluxCD, bootstrapping it with GitHub, setting up Kustomizations and HelmReleases, and managing multi-environment deployments with GitOps.